найдите слово в электронном адресе видео на YouTube, используя это в адресной строке Google:
allinurl:[ваше слово здесь, по-английски ] site:youtube.com/watch
Где находятся ваши пальцы и откуда вы это знаете? Что вообще значит «знать» и где хранятся наши знания о реальном мире? А точно ли мир реален? Ответы на эти и другие вопросы пытается найти Майкл в своём видео.
Перевод: Никита Лашук
Редактура: Алевтина Поминова
Озвучка: Тим Эрна
Монтаж видео: Роман Казарцев
Обложка: Глеб Брайко
Mikhail Stolpovskiy, Makovskyj Danilo, Boris Bendikov, Dina Vysotskaya, Максим Sheridan Горлов, Anton Makiievskyi, Gurov D.A., Alexander Kalashnikov, Alex Derepasko, Vladimir Grachev, Spartak Kagramanyan, Dmitriy Omelyansky, Dmytro Kostochko, Kirill Khrulev, Vladimir Goshev, Vladyslav Sokolenko, Key Rebet, Уладзімір Пашкевіч, Mikhail Levitsky, Vadim Zubovicch, Aleksei Masliukov, Olga Polyakova, Ruslan Akhmerov, Vladimir Gavriushov, Maria Burtseva, Aleksey Sazonov, Evgenii Bakhmet, Никита Рыжков, Anna Gerasimenko, Дмитрий Мисюра, Руслан Островский, Андрей, Александр Фалалеев, Ilia Mardanov, Soz Nov
Куда всё падает? Почему объекты падают? На эти вопросы Майкл Стивенс попробует ответить, начав с азов и закончив общей теорией относительности Эйнштейна. По пути он превратит Солнце в черную дыру и заставит постареть карандаш. В итоге выдав прекрасное научно-популярное блюдо под соусом из необычных заключений.
More About FTL:
Ethan Kane, a NASA Astronaut and decorated pilot, has recently retired from active duty to spend more time with his wife and young son. As he tries to adjust to a quieter life on the ground, he’s approached to fly one last mission...testing the first faster-than-light spacecraft. While the world watches, Kane takes The Longshot on its maiden voyage.
About DUST:
DUST presents thought-provoking science fiction content, exploring the future of humanity through the lens of science and technology. From timeless classics to cutting-edge movies, series, short films, and podcasts, DUST acquires, produces and distributes all content types.
About Gunpowder Sky:
Creating content that resonates and impacts pop culture conversation, by empowering creators to take risks and experiment relentlessly in the pursuit of novel stories and formats.
Were Earth Unplugged and we make videos about the incredible natural world and the animals that live here — exclusively for YouTube. From animal behaviour in slow motion, educational videos, expedition films and beyond we’ve got you covered. Our planet is mind-blowing. Join us as we explore what it has to offer.
Want to share your views with the team behind BBC Earth and win prizes? Join our BBC Studios Voice: www.bbcstudiosvoice.com/register
This is a channel from BBC Studios, trading as BBC Studios, who help fund new BBC programmes. Service information and feedback: www.bbcworldwide.com/ContactWizard
Centripetal force is needed to keep things moving in a circle. And why dont they want to? THEY JUST WANT TO GO IN A STRAIGHT LINE. REALLY. THATS ALL EVERYTHING WANTS TO DO.
P.S. If you have a masters degree or PhD in physics and would like to talk to me about rotating reference frames, Id love to. But this is not the right context. This videos purpose is to demonstrate inertia in inertial reference frames. You know, the ones where Newtons Laws apply. Yeah, those. Certainly youll agree that inertia is of the greatest conceptual importance. As a teacher, I have found that most people I meet do not have a conceptual understanding of inertia though they are able to recite Newtons First Law in a droning voice when asked. Words with no meaning. Blech.
BTW — Those who like accelerated reference frames and their challenges may enjoy this video about impending motion of rigid solids: www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLHVf3eJKak
I made it. Maybe you like watching physics videos in your spare time.
And I will SORTA agree with you if you claim that theres a centrifugal force on the wood ring (as a 3rd-law counterpart to the centripetal force on the ball). I like Newtons 3rd as much as the next guy, but youre creating a REALLY shady definition. If we had no friction, the ring wouldnt even be moving. How you gonna define «center fleeing» for something that is not only not going in a circle...its not moving at all??!@?#$%?^$#?%$# But thats just a technical complaint. Really, I am just trying to convince early physics students that the BALL feels no outward force. Cuz trust me, THEY THINK IT DOES. Ask your mom — she may even think the ball feels an outward force. My people often predict that the balls path will curve OUTWARD from the circle. Thats what Im really trying to cure here. Love you, though! Keep warm this winter!